POPCLIM Right-wing populism and the political feasibility of climate policy

This project seeks to understand the relationship between right-wing populism (RWP) and opposition to climate science and policy, and to identify climate policy options that are politically feasible even in electorates inclined to support RWP.

Bilde mangler beskrivelse

This project seeks to understand the relationship between right-wing populism (RWP) and opposition to climate science and policy. Photo: istock

Prosjektfakta

Start og sluttdato
1.12.2021 - 30.11.2025

Right-wing populism (RWP) has been on the rise in many democracies and has become an entrenched long-lasting force across the world that will continue to shape politics. Extant studies have found that RWP is linked with opposition to climate policy but has not come far in explaining the opposition. To facilitate a more constructive inclusion of these groups in climate policy debates, this project seeks to better understand the mechanisms involved.

In the nascent literature on the association between RWP and climate opposition, two different explanations have been suggested. A structuralist explanation points to a common cause for the two phenomena, namely structural changes in the global economy. The other explanation draws on the ideological content of RWP, especially its antagonism between ‘the people’ and a cosmopolitan elite, arguing the climate policy take on a symbolic role in this perceived conflict.

This project will:

1) Conduct and analyze a survey to test the two explanations for RWP opposition to climate policy among voters across four countries (Australia, Germany, Norway, USA).

2) Explore climate opposition among RWP parties and party fractions in the same countries. The two explanations will be tested through a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis.

3) Investigate the relative importance of privileged versus marginalized groups as drivers of RWP supporters’ opposition to climate policy. 

4) Explore how the strength of resistance from RWP supporters varies across different questions relating to climate science and policy and across time. It will draw on four years of data from a survey following the same Norwegian individuals over time.

Outcomes

Six refereed journal articles and plus a set of briefs for policymakers in Norway, Germany, USA and Australia that provide a summary of the key research findings with policy options for responding to RWP opposition to climate policies based on the research results.

Impact

The project will test both structural, ideological and psychological explanations that seek to account for RWP political opposition to climate science and contribute to the scholarly debate on the drivers of political opposition to climate action. It will also provide insights for policymakers on understanding and responding to RWP opposition to climate policies.

Outreach activities

The project will organize workshops and trainings targeting municipalities in all four countries in collaboration with CNCA (carbonneutralcities.org) and KS.

We will also organize breakfast seminars/webinars open to the general public. At the end of the project we will organize an international webinar for policy makers. 

The public events will be announced. 

The project team: 

Dr. Håkon Sælen at CICERO Centre for International Climate Research is the project leader. 

Collaborative and advisory partners are:

Contact: 

Håkon Sælen: hakon.salen@cicero.oslo.no

Publications in the project

From Trump’s wrecking ball to China’s electrifying rise, geopolitics hang heavy over this year’s climate talks

11 November 2025

Next month marks the tenth anniversary of the Paris Agreement, hailed as humanity’s best shot at keeping climate change under control. Between then and now, the world has changed dramatically.

Read the article here: From Trump’s wrecking ball to China’s electrifying rise, geopolitics hang heavy over this year’s climate talks
 

Climate policy opposition and the populist radical right

21 october 2025

In this interview, Håkon Grøn Sælen discusses the research and findings of his recent article in Environmental Politics, co-authored with Aaron M. McCright: What explains the relationship between populist radical right attitudes and opposition to climate policy?: structural vs. ideological factors.

Climate policy opposition and the populist radical right – Environmental Politics Journal
 

What explains the relationship between populist radical right attitudes and opposition to climate policy? Structural vs. ideological factors

2 September 2025

Abstract: Populism of the radical right is strongly associated with climate change denial and opposition to climate policy, but we lack understanding of why these two phenomena are linked. This article tests two alternative explanations presented by extant literature. A structuralist explanation argues that the link is spurious, as both are caused by perceived vulnerability to structural changes in the economy. In highlighting that the ideological nature of radical right populism is antithetical to climate policy, an ideological explanation posits that any apparent effect of structural changes on climate policy attitudes is mediated by radical right populist ideology. We present data from an original survey administered in Australia, Germany, Norway, and the United States that is designed to test the two hypotheses against each other. Two different structural equation modeling analyses provide greater support for the ideological explanation than the structuralist explanation.

Read the full article here: What explains the relationship between populist radical right attitudes and opposition to climate policies

Andre involverte

McCright, ​Aaron, Eckersley, ​Robyn, Guri Bang